It’s not bullying, Alan: it’s a call to account

I wasn’t going to write about the Alan Jones saga but the story resonates with so much of what I’ve written here recently that I can’t ignore it.

In this post last month “Facebook – complaint or corporate social responsibility cue?”  I shared a reminder that listening to social media is a “litmus for community expectations and a source of ideas for good corporate citizenship”.

When citizens take to social media to admonish Alan Jones for his recent comments about the Prime Minister, it is not cyber bullying. It’s the community demanding a higher standard of behaviour from one of the nation’s most well-known broadcasters. When citizens ask businesses to stop advertising on that radio station, again, they are seeking a higher standard of behaviour and demonstration of their values and ethics. [And while some enthusiasts may have engaged in bullying tactics when it came to asking advertisers to pull the plug, their behaviour was theirs to own, and focusing on them alone is a diversionary tactic. A lot of the anti Alan Jones campaign was measured, reasonable and valid].

This ‘online activism’ has been happening for years already and as long as social media continues to be a tool for people to 1) easily congregate and vent via a smartphone or keyboard and 2) make things happen, this use of social media won’t go away.

If you’re a corporation, be prepared.

Look at how you conduct your business, who your partners are, your impact on the environment,  how you treat your employees and so on.

Listen to what people are saying on social media: monitor the internet for key search terms related to your business, products, managers and competitors. Don’t ignore complaints that have been dogging your business for years. Get on the front foot and do the right thing.

But remember, too, that social media doesn’t cause activism.  It’s no use wanting to give Facebook a kick or wishing that people weren’t allowed to tweet anonymously. If there’s an underlying issue with a business practice or an individual’s behaviour, it exists regardless of whether social media is around.

Also, people have the ability to voice themselves online regardless of whether you’re using social media officially. There are countless examples of people establishing Facebook Pages or other online spaces to complain about a company. They don’t need your company to be present: they’ll do it on their own. So shying away from officially using social media won’t mean you’ll never be the subject of an online campaign.

Social media merely shines a light on what’s already rotten.

3 Comments Add yours

  1. Jen says:

    It’s a classic case of a bully trying to deflect the blame in regard to their own actions. Kind of related, have you seen the Destroy the Joint Facebook page, soon to also have their own website.

  2. Prakky says:

    Hi Jen, yes I’ve seen that page and I follow the ‘Sack Alan Jones’ Facebook page to keep up with that community. It has just posted a link to the new Destroy the Joint website

  3. Colin says:

    It’s characteristic of people like Alan Jones to spit the dummy and cry “bully” when right-minded people stand up and call them to account. One question is how could someone like Jones have been allowed to go on for so long, with the kind of demeaning bully-boy tactics he employs? It may be what he’s always done, long-entrenched in his style of bombastic broadcasting, but it’s great to see people now standing up and saying “No more!” Of course, there are other broadcasters of the Jones ilk, including here in Adelaide, and (unfortunately) they will always have a certain following. Let’s hope natural attrition will take care of what public outcry cannot control.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s